본문바로가기

What we do

We aim to provide our clients with intelligence,
future-directed information and analysis.

Report purchase request

  • Sales team
  • 070-4006-0265 / 070-4006-1507 / 070-4006-0355

  • sales@sneresearch.com

Purchase inquiry
Battery, Emerging Industry

<2026> Technology Development Status and Market Outlook for Humanoid Robots and Robot Batteries (~2040)

 

 

At CES 2026, humanoid robots emerged as a central pillar of the technology exhibition, with various new products combining AI and Physical AI showcasing the current state of industrial, service, and home robots. In particular, global companies such as Nvidia, LG, and Boston Dynamics demonstrated robots with real task execution capabilities and interactive functions, highlighting how AI-based control and perception technologies are accelerating robot commercialization.

 

Boston Dynamics unveiled its next-generation electric Atlas robot at CES 2026, targeting real-world deployment in manufacturing environments. Companies from Korea, China, and the United States competitively showcased models applicable to industrial, service, and entertainment sectors, indicating a shift from traditional demonstration-focused exhibitions toward real-environment testing and deployment.

 

In China, companies such as UBTECH, Unitree, and various startups presented advanced humanoid robots throughout the exhibition. Some demonstrated fully autonomous industrial tasks such as component sorting and handling, while others emphasized applications in factories, logistics, and services through interactive demos. Meanwhile, Korea and Japan also showcased not only robot platforms but also key components such as actuators, reducers, sensors, and batteries, highlighting their strategies to expand the ecosystem by strengthening core component competitiveness.

 

Meanwhile, Elon Musk stated that humanoid robots (Optimus) could become Tesla’s largest business in the long term, emphasizing that they could create far greater economic value than vehicles. He also announced plans to convert part of the Model S/X EV production lines into humanoid robot production lines, targeting annual production of 1 million units. Furthermore, he noted that Optimus would begin by replacing factory labor and gradually expand to substitute everyday human labor, with a goal of reducing the price to below $20,000 through mass production.

 

Recent humanoid robot development can be summarized into (1) the transition of hardware to mass production, (2) rapid advancement of intelligence (Embodied AI), and (3) the establishment of safety, reliability, and operational (SoS) systems for real-world deployment. In the past, the key question was whether robots could walk or not, but now the competition centers on how long they can operate, how cost-efficient they are, how safe they are, and how many units can be deployed. In particular, repetitive tasks in manufacturing and logistics have clear ROI calculations, making them the most promising initial commercialization markets.

 

Global research firms’ market outlooks for humanoid robots vary significantly depending on how the market is defined. Therefore, it is reasonable to divide them into (1) market size (revenue) forecasts and (2) shipment/deployment (unit volume) forecasts.

 

Goldman Sachs estimated the humanoid robot TAM (Total Addressable Market) at $38 billion by 2035. MarketsandMarkets projected the “Humanoid Robot Market” to grow from $2.92 billion in 2025 to $15.26 billion by 2030, while IDTechEx also suggested growth potential to around $30 billion by 2035. Meanwhile, UBS presented a range of $30–50 billion by 2035, and further outlined a broader ecosystem—including components, data, and services—expanding to $1.4–1.7 trillion by 2050.

 

According to SNE Research, alongside declining cell prices by battery chemistry (LFP, NCM, semi-solid, all-solid-state), the average cell ASP is expected to fall to $94/kWh by 2035 and around $70/kWh by 2040. As a result, the humanoid robot battery cell market is projected to exceed $10.5 billion by 2040.

 

From a shipment/deployment perspective, Omdia forecasts over 10,000 units by 2027 and approximately 38,000 units by 2030. Bank of America presents an aggressive long-term scenario with annual shipments reaching around 1 million units between 2030 and 2035. Morgan Stanley, instead of focusing on market revenue, approaches the topic from the perspective of labor and wages, estimating 8 million working humanoids in the U.S. by 2040 and an impact of $357 billion on wages.

 

Finally, a critical factor in robot deployment is the battery, which limits operating time. Currently, operating time is approximately 2–4 hours, but it can be significantly reduced depending on load and operating conditions, creating constraints on robot utilization.

 

Unlike EV batteries, humanoid robot batteries must simultaneously satisfy high power (peak output), frequent charge/discharge cycles, lightweight and compact design, and safety for close human interaction. Accordingly, global battery companies are recognizing robots as a new demand source and are moving toward strengthening high-discharge performance, safety design, swappable/modular packaging, and BMS algorithms.

 

LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI can be seen extending their capabilities in high-power, high-reliability cells/modules for robots, along with safety evaluation know-how and BMS technologies, similar to their approach in UAM and drones. Chinese major players (CATL, EVE, etc.) are also clearly moving toward improving both energy density and safety through high-power product lineups and semi-solid/all-solid-state roadmaps for robots and drones. From a robot-focused perspective, companies like Grepow, which are strong in high-discharge packs for drones and robots, are expanding the market by offering integrated solutions including pack design, thermal management, connectors, and protection circuits.

 

From a battery form factor perspective, practical options can be summarized as (1) cylindrical-based modules (e.g., 2170/4680), (2) pouch-based customized packs, and (3) swappable cartridge (hot swap) packs. Cylindrical cells benefit from a large supply chain and strong cost/maturity advantages, making them suitable for mass production. Pouch cells offer greater design flexibility due to efficient space utilization in irregular structures such as the robot torso, back, and pelvis. Hot swap reduces downtime for 24-hour operations (factories/logistics), but increases system complexity due to connector durability, surge protection, and dual power system design requirements.

 

Application scenarios vary: in industrial settings, hot swap combined with fleet management (swap stations) is dominant; in service/retail, docking-based charging (semi-autonomous to autonomous) is more practical; and for home use, autonomous docking with fast top-up charging becomes important due to usability. Ultimately, humanoid battery competitiveness is likely to evolve into system-level competition encompassing not only cell chemistry but also pack structure, thermal management, charging/swapping UX, and BMS software.

 

This report is not limited to a single topic such as market outlook or application scenarios for humanoid robots. Instead, it comprehensively covers key technologies, core components such as actuators and batteries, operational software, and market outlooks, enabling a holistic understanding from technology to market in a single report.

 

 

 

 

Therefore, the strengths of this report are as follows:

 

This report provides a deep-dive analysis of core technologies and key components, enabling insights into technical issues and future development outlooks of humanoid robots.

 

It offers a more detailed description of the development history, current status, and information of global humanoid robot manufacturers, which have previously been relatively simplified, thereby greatly helping to understand the current landscape.

 

The market outlook is segmented into three areas—industrial/logistics, service/retail, and household—and utilizes highly reliable data based on UN organizations such as UNIDO and ILO, as well as major public sources, thereby enhancing the credibility of the analysis by closely reflecting real-world conditions.

 

For batteries, the outlook is categorized by chemistry types such as LFP, NCM, semi-solid, and all-solid-state, and also by form factors including cylindrical, pouch, prismatic, and structural/custom packs, allowing for more realistic and practical forecasting.

 

 

 

Contents


1. Overview of the Humanoid Robot Industry and Market and Commercialization Outlook 11
   1-1. Humanoid Robots 12
   1-1-1. Morphological Classification 13
   1-1-2. Detailed Specifications of Major Companies’ Models 14
   1-2. Overview of the Humanoid Robot Industry 18
   1-2-1. Explosive Growth and the Commercialization Inflection Point 19
   1-2-2. Development Stages: Transition from Level 3 (Conditional Autonomy) to Level 4 (High-Level Autonomy) 20
   1-3. Humanoid Robot Market Outlook 21
   1-3-1. Global Market Outlook 21
   1-3-2. U.S. Market Outlook 34
   1-3-3. China Market Outlook 36
   1-3-4. U.S. vs. China 42
   1-3-5. Humanoid Robot Manufacturing Cost Structure 45
   1-3-6. Analysis of Humanoid Robot Costs and Investment Payback Period 46
   1-3-7. Comparison of Forecasts by Research Firms 47
   1-3-8. Market Size of Core Components for Humanoid Robots 48
   1-3-9. Global Robot Dog Market: Expected to Exceed RMB 8 Billion (USD 1.12 Billion) by 2030 49
   1-3-10. CES 2026 50
1-4. Status of Global Humanoid Robot Manufacturers 53
   1-4-1. U.S. Companies and Chinese Companies 53
   1-4-2. Detailed Overview of Overseas Companies 54
   1-4-3. Detailed Overview of Chinese Companies 55
   1-4-4. Company Types and Capabilities of Major Players 56
   1-4-5. Status of Global Big Tech Companies 57
   1-4-6. Development History of Major Companies 58
   1-4-7. Continued Entry of Large Corporations and Strengthening Trends 62
   1-4-8. Active Participation of a Wide Range of Global Companies 63
   
2. National Policies, Industrialization Strategies, and Commercialization of Humanoid Robots 64
   2-1. Global Trends in the Humanoid Robot Industry 65
   2-1-1. Development History and Key Characteristics by Country 65
   2-1-2. United States, Europe, and Japan 66
   2-1-3. Japan 67
   2-1-4. China 68
   2-2. Development Strategies and Commercialization Roadmap 75
   2-2-1. Accelerating Technological Advancement 75
   2-2-2. (Models with In-House Development of Both H/W and S/W) vs. (In-House Robot Development with Collaborative Development of Large S/W Models) 77
   2-2-3. Commercialization Roadmap for Humanoid Robots 78
   2-2-4. Production Plans of Major Companies by Country 79
   2-2-5. Application Scenarios 80
   2-2-6. Short-Term Applications 82
   2-2-7. Long-Term Applications 83
   2-2-8. From Specialized Use to General-Purpose Use 85
   2-2-9. Commercialization 86
   
3. Core Intelligence Technologies Used in Humanoid Robots 87
   3-1. Humanoid Robot Intelligence Technologies and Terminology 88
   3-2. Embodied AI / LLM and VLA Technologies 89
   3-2-1. Embodied AI Technologies Enhance the Autonomous Operation Capabilities of Humanoid Robots 90
   3-2-2. Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) 91
   3-2-3. Development of Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) 93
   3-2-4. Figure 03 General-Purpose Vision–Language–Action (VLA) Model 104
   3-3. Learning Infrastructure (Data, Training, Motion Capture) 109
   3-3-1. Training 109
   3-3-2. Data 110
   3-3-3. Internet (Video) Data 111
   3-3-4. Simulation Data 112
   3-3-5. Real-World Data 113
   3-3-6. High-Precision Motion Capture Systems 114
   3-3-7. Inertial Motion Capture 115
   
4. NVIDIA-Centric Robot Software and Platforms 116
   4-1. Software for Humanoid Robots 117
   4-1-1. Software: Shortage of Intelligent Data Hindering Industry Development 117
   4-1-2. Software: Lack of High-Quality Datasets and Specialized Application Scenarios 118
   4-1-3. Software: Physical AI and the Concepts of ACP and MCP 119
   4-1-4. Software: Comparison of Physical AI and ACP/MCP and the Importance of a Decoupled Architecture 120
   4-1-5. Software: Physical AI and ACP/MCP Strategies—Comparison of Tesla, Boston Dynamics, and Figure 121
   4-2. NVIDIA Physical AI Platform Strategy and Partner Ecosystem 122
   4-2-1. Core of Physical AI: Perception, Understanding, and Interaction 122
   4-2-2. Building a Physical AI Ecosystem Based on Omniverse 123
   4-2-3. Establishing an Omniverse-Based Development Ecosystem 124
   4-2-4. Development Platforms and Tools – Bottom-Up Integration 125
   4-2-5. Development of the Newton Robot Physics Engine 127
   4-2-6. NVIDIA AI and Robotics Engineering Partners 128
   4-2-7. NVIDIA Humanoid Robot Partners 129
   4-2-8. Three Computing Platform Solution Frameworks 130
   4-2-9. DGX Platform: Optimal Combination of Infrastructure and Expertise 131
   4-2-10. AGX Platform: Revolution in Embedded AI Product Development 132
   4-2-11. Omniverse Development Platform – AI-Based Tool Ecosystem 133
   4-2-12. Cosmos Platform – World Foundation Model 135
   4-2-13. Release of Large-Scale Open-Source Datasets and the GROOT N1 General-Purpose Humanoid Robot Model 136
   
5. Tesla Optimus Deep Dive 137
   5-1. Tesla Technology Evolution, Mass Production Strategy, and Market Potential 138
   5-1-1. Tesla AI Day Timeline 138
   5-1-2. Performance Improvements of Tesla Humanoid Robots 139
   5-1-3. Tesla AI Day 2022 140
   5-1-4. Technological Advancements of Tesla Optimus 155
   5-1-5. Rapid Functional Improvements of Tesla Optimus 156
   5-1-6. Core Hardware Solution Components of Tesla Optimus 157
   5-1-7. Market Size of Tesla Optimus 158
   5-1-8. Market Outlook and Production Strategy for Tesla Humanoid Robots (Optimus) 159
   5-2. Tesla Patent Analysis (PCT/US2023/033983) 160
   5-2-1. Tesla’s Vertical Energy Storage Enclosure Technology Serving as the Robot Torso 160
   5-2-2. Robust Physical Coupling With Robot Limbs Through Multi-Angle Attachment Points 161
   5-2-3. Efficient Simultaneous Cooling Mechanism for Batteries and Computers Using Thermal Ducts 162
   
6. Boston Dynamics ATLAS Deep Dive 163
   6-1. ATLAS Technology Comparison, Generation Evolution, and Battery Strategy 163
   6-1-1. Overview of the ATLAS 2026 Version 164
   6-1-2. Key Specifications of ATLAS 2026 165
   6-1-3. Key Functions of ATLAS 2026 166
   6-1-4. Comparison of 1st-Gen Griper (GR1) vs. 2nd-Gen Griper (GR2) 167
   6-1-5. 2nd-Gen Griper – Opposable Thumb 168
   6-1-6. Three Fingers Are Sufficient / Left–Right Hand Differentiation 169
   6-1-7. Beyond-Human Range of Motion, Two-Handed Operation, and Tactile Sensing 170
   6-1-8. Key Changes Between ATLAS 2024 and 2026 171
   6-1-9. Technology Comparison: ATLAS 2024 vs. Optimus vs. Figure 03 172
   6-1-10. Battery Strategy 173
   
7. Industrial Applications of Humanoid Robots 175
   7-1. Expansion of Adoption (Manufacturing and Logistics) and Addressing Labor Supply–Demand Imbalances 176
   7-1-1. Amazon: Accelerating Deployment of Logistics Robots 176
   7-1-2. Automakers: Expanding Adoption in Intelligent Factories 177
   7-1-3. Manufacturers: A Key Factor in Easing Labor Supply–Demand Imbalances 178
   7-1-4. Across Industries: Expected to Mitigate Labor Shortages 179
   7-1-5. Aerospace Sector 180
   7-1-6. CATL 181
   7-1-7. BMW 182
   7-1-8. Figure AI 183
   7-1-9. China Media Group 184
   7-1-10. Dongfeng Liuzhou Motors 185
   
8. Core Components and System Elements of Humanoid Robots 186
   8-1. Core Elements and Technical Challenges 187
   8-1-1. Core Components 187
   8-1-2. Comparison of Core Component Configurations 188
   8-1-3. AI as the Heart of Machines 190
   8-2. Actuators, Motors, Gearboxes, and Screws 191
   8-2-1. Actuator Configuration 191
   8-2-2. Definitions and Functions of Core Components for Humanoid Robots 192
   8-2-3. Company-by-Company Strategy Comparison and Cost, Reliability, and Mass-Production Readiness Comparison 193
   8-2-4. Cost Outlook for Core Components 194
   8-2-5. Planetary Roller Screw 195
   8-2-6. Frameless Torque Motor 197
   8-2-7. Gearbox 199
   8-2-8. Screw 207
   8-3. Dexterous Hand (Precision Hand) 216
   8-3-1. Overview of Dexterous Hands 216
   8-3-2. Types and Comparison of Dexterous Hand Structures 217
   8-3-3. Comparison of Hollow Cup Motors, Coreless Motors, and Brushless Cogging Motors 218
   8-3-4. Coreless Motors and Market Size 219
   8-3-5. Various Power Transmission Methods 220
   8-3-6. Market Outlook for Coreless (DC) Motors 221
   8-3-7. Comparison of Atlas GR2 vs. Human Hands vs. Tesla Optimus Hands 223
   8-3-8. Optimal DoF Scenarios for Next-Generation Dexterous Hands 224
   8-4. Sensors (Force, Torque, Encoders, Vision, Tactile) 225
   8-4-1. Overview of Sensors (Internal and External) 225
   8-4-2. Torque Sensors (Six-Axis Sensors) 226
   8-4-3. Force Sensors (Six-Axis Force Sensors) 227
   8-4-4. Force and Torque Sensors 230
   8-4-5. Encoders 235
   8-4-6. Vision Sensors 237
   8-4-7. Tactile Sensors 242
   8-4-8. Control Systems 246
   8-5. Quadruped Robots 248
   8-5-1. Low-Cost, High-Performance Quadruped Actuators and Body Structure Design 248
   8-5-2. Leg Design to Improve Locomotion Capability 249
   8-5-3. System Reliability and Safety Devices 250
   
9. Batteries for Humanoid Robots 251
   9-1. Development Status, Market, Competitive Landscape, and Comparison With EVs 252
   9-1-1. Battery Development for Humanoid Robots 252
   9-1-2. Battery Market for Humanoid Robots 265
   
10. Battery Applications for Humanoid Robots 270
    10-1. Application Cases 271
    10-1-1. Tesla Optimus 271
    10-1-2. 1X Technologies 274
    10-1-3. UBTECH 276
    10-1-4. Applications to Batteries for Autonomous Robots 280
    10-1-5. Applications to Humanoid Robots and Quadruped Robots 281
    10-2. Company Development Status 282
    10-2-1. Grepow (CN) 282
    10-2-2. Nandu Power (南都电源) vs. Delco (德尔股份) 285
    10-2-3. BTR (贝特瑞) vs. Haopeng (豪鹏科技) 286
    10-2-4. EVE Energy (亿纬锂能) vs. Lyric Robot (利元亨) 287
    10-2-5. MANST (曼恩斯特) vs. Guansheng Tech (冠盛股份) 288
    10-2-6. Gotion High-Tech (国轩高科) 289
    10-2-7. Dataa Robotics (CN) 290
    10-2-8. IL (IL Science, Korea) 293
   
11. Battery Design, Safety, Thermal Management, and Cell/Pack Estimation for Humanoid Robots 295
    11-1. Battery Design, Safety, and Thermal Management 296
    11-1-1. Figure 03 Battery 296
    11-2. Battery Cell/Pack Estimation 301
    11-2-1. Power Consumption by Body Part and Required Energy Calculation for Humanoid Robots 301
    11-2-2. Estimation of the Number of 2170 Cells and Pack Size, and Feasibility of Installation 302
    11-2-3. Estimation of the Number of 4680 Cells and Pack Size, and Feasibility of Installation 303
    11-2-4. Estimation of Installed Battery Pack Capacity for Major Humanoid Models 304
    11-2-5. Comparison of Installed Capacity vs. Actual Capacity and Fit Assessment 305
    11-2-6. Gap Analysis and Roadmap for 2–8 Hour Operation 306
    11-2-7. Structural Batteries, Specialized Batteries, and Estimation of Optimus Cells 307
    11-2-8. Battery Specifications Applied by Robot Manufacturers 308
   
12. Battery Form Factors and Pack Design/Modeling for Multi-Legged Robots 309
    12-1. Next-Generation Structural Batteries (EFSB) 310
    12-1-1. Overview of EFSB 310
    12-1-2. EFSB: Serving as Tendons and Legs of Robots 311
    12-1-3. EFSB: Electrochemical Performance and Durability 312
    12-1-4. EFSB: Application to Soft Robots – Integration of Energy Storage and Actuation Functions 313
    12-1-5. EFSB: Application to Flying Robots – Maximizing High-Power Discharge and Portability 314
    12-2. High-Power Battery Pack Design and Modeling for Multi-Legged Robots 315
    12-2-1. Background of Battery Pack Design and Transient Performance Modeling for High-Power Multi-Legged Robots 315
    12-2-2. Molicel-Based P45B 16S3P Design 316
    12-2-3. Mechanical Structure and Electrical System 317
    12-2-4. Battery Modeling and EIS Analysis 318
    12-2-5. Integrated Simulation and Optimization 319
   
13. Humanoid Cost Structure and Low-Cost BOM Strategies 320
    13-1. Cost Analysis 321
    13-1-1. Humanoid Robots, Actuators, Sensors, and LiDAR 321
    13-1-2. Computing, Batteries, Skeleton, and Software 322
    13-1-3. Cost Range by Component 323
    13-1-4. Conditions for a Humanoid Price Below $20K 324
    13-1-5. 2025–2030 Cost Scenarios 325
    13-1-6. 2030 BOM (Example): 50 Joints + 2.0 kWh 326
    13-1-7. Cost Reduction Strategies 327
    13-1-8. Estimated Unit Cost of Tesla Bot 329
    13-1-9. Outlook for Tesla Robot BOM (Based on China-Made Component Pricing) 330
    13-1-10. Cost Share by Humanoid Robot Component 331
   
14. Issues and Technical Challenges Related to Humanoid Robots 332
    14-1. Issues Facing Humanoid Robots 333
    14-1-1. High Manufacturing Costs 333
    14-1-2. High Maintenance Costs 334
    14-1-3. Difficulty in Addressing Diverse Requirements 335
    14-1-4. Industrial Safety Standards Not Yet Fully Established 336
    14-1-5. Ethical Issues 338
    14-2. Technical Challenges of Humanoid Robots 339
    14-2-1. Fatigue Failure of Compliant Gears → Increased Failure Rates 340
    14-2-2. Transmission Ratio Limitations of Harmonic Gear Reducers → Degraded Accuracy and Response Speed 340
    14-2-3. Temperature Rise Control of Frameless Torque Motors → Reduced Mechanical Energy Efficiency 341
    14-2-4. Limitations in Data Collection Methods → Impact on Learning and Adaptability 342
    14-2-5. Hardware and Software Limitations → Impact on Robot Adaptability and Performance 343
    14-2-6. Software Limitations 344
    14-2-7. Still-Low Level of Artificial Intelligence 347
   
15. Industry Trends for Humanoid Robot-Related Companies 348
    15-1. Overview of Major Humanoid Robot Companies 349
    15-2. Tesla (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 350
    15-3. Boston Dynamics (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 354
    15-4. Agility Robotics (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 358
    15-5. 1X Technologies (SWE): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 361
    15-6. UBTECH Robotics (CN): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 366
    15-7. Unitree Robotics (CN): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 370
    15-8. Rainbow Robotics (KR): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 385
    15-9. Honda (JP): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing 388
    15-10. Tesla (US): Actuators 391
    15-11. 1X Technologies (SWE): Actuators 395
    15-12. UBTECH Robotics (CN): Actuators 397
    15-13. Rollvis (SWE): Planetary Roller Screws 399
    15-14. Ewellix (SWE): Planetary Roller Screws 402
    15-15. QCMT&T (CN): Planetary Roller Screws 404
    15-16. Bosch (DE): Sensors 406
    15-17. Honeywell (US): Sensors 409
    15-18. Texas Instruments (US): Sensors 412
    15-19. Hanwei Electronics (CN): Sensors 415
    15-20. Kollmorgen (US): Frameless Torque Motors 417
    15-21. Parker (US): Frameless Torque Motors 421
    15-22. Aerotech (US): Frameless Torque Motors 424
    15-23. Kinco (CN): Frameless Torque Motors 427
    15-24. Nabtesco (JP): Gearboxes 431
    15-25. Siemens (DE): Gearboxes 435
    15-26. Kollmorgen (US): Gearboxes 438
    15-27. Harmonic (CN): Gearboxes 440
   
16. Humanoid Robot Company and Product Landscape 443
    16-1. Korea: LG Electronics, Holiday Robotics, ROBROS, AROBOT, ROBOTIS, WIRobotics, Rainbow Robotics, Robotics LAB, NAVER Labs 444
    16-2. Japan: KAWASAKI, TOYOTA Research Institute, Honda Robotics, HITACHI, KONDO, SoftBank Robotics, SONY, TokyoRobotics 448
    16-3. China: AgiBot, UNITREE, ENGINEAI, AT ROBOTICS, UBTECH, Noetix Robotics, ESTUN, Fourier, Kepler, Leju Robot, Haribit, Fourier, GALBOT, TSROBOT, Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, CHERY, PUDU, UBTECH, REEMAN, Robot Era, UniX AI, XIAOMI, XPENG 450
    16-4. United States: Boston Dynamics, RoboForce, Cartwheel, Diligent Robotics, Figure, Hanson Robotics, Agility Robotics, Apptronik, Westwood Robotics, Beyond Imagination, Borg Robotics, Tesla, Figure 458
    16-5. Germany: Agile Robotics, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), German Aerospace Center (DLR), NEURA Robotics 463
    16-6. United Kingdom: HUMANOID, ENGINEERED ARTS 464
    16-7. Canada: Mirsee Robotics, SANCTUARY AI, Realbotix 466
    16-8. France: Enchanted Tools, Wandercraft, InMoov 467
    16-9. Italy: Istituto Italiano di Technologia (iit), ErgoCub 468
    16-10. Spain: PAL Robotics, Keybotic, Macco Robotics 469
    16-11. Norway: 1X Technologies 470
    16-12. Switzerland: Hexagon Robotics, Duatic AG, Anybotics AG, RIVR 471