<2026> Technology Development Status and Market Outlook for Humanoid Robots and Robot Batteries (~2040)
At CES
2026, humanoid robots emerged as a central pillar of the technology exhibition,
with various new products combining AI and Physical AI showcasing the current
state of industrial, service, and home robots. In particular, global companies
such as Nvidia, LG, and Boston Dynamics demonstrated robots with real task
execution capabilities and interactive functions, highlighting how AI-based
control and perception technologies are accelerating robot commercialization.
Boston
Dynamics unveiled its next-generation electric Atlas robot at CES 2026,
targeting real-world deployment in manufacturing environments. Companies from
Korea, China, and the United States competitively showcased models applicable
to industrial, service, and entertainment sectors, indicating a shift from
traditional demonstration-focused exhibitions toward real-environment testing
and deployment.
In China,
companies such as UBTECH, Unitree, and various startups presented advanced
humanoid robots throughout the exhibition. Some demonstrated fully autonomous
industrial tasks such as component sorting and handling, while others
emphasized applications in factories, logistics, and services through
interactive demos. Meanwhile, Korea and Japan also showcased not only robot
platforms but also key components such as actuators, reducers, sensors, and
batteries, highlighting their strategies to expand the ecosystem by
strengthening core component competitiveness.
Meanwhile,
Elon Musk stated that humanoid robots (Optimus) could become Tesla’s largest
business in the long term, emphasizing that they could create far greater
economic value than vehicles. He also announced plans to convert part of the
Model S/X EV production lines into humanoid robot production lines, targeting
annual production of 1 million units. Furthermore, he noted that Optimus would
begin by replacing factory labor and gradually expand to substitute everyday
human labor, with a goal of reducing the price to below $20,000 through mass
production.
Recent
humanoid robot development can be summarized into (1) the transition of
hardware to mass production, (2) rapid advancement of intelligence (Embodied
AI), and (3) the establishment of safety, reliability, and operational (SoS)
systems for real-world deployment. In the past, the key question was whether
robots could walk or not, but now the competition centers on how long they can
operate, how cost-efficient they are, how safe they are, and how many units can
be deployed. In particular, repetitive tasks in manufacturing and logistics
have clear ROI calculations, making them the most promising initial
commercialization markets.
Global
research firms’ market outlooks for humanoid robots vary significantly
depending on how the market is defined. Therefore, it is reasonable to divide
them into (1) market size (revenue) forecasts and (2) shipment/deployment (unit
volume) forecasts.
Goldman
Sachs estimated the humanoid robot TAM (Total Addressable Market) at $38
billion by 2035. MarketsandMarkets projected the “Humanoid Robot Market” to
grow from $2.92 billion in 2025 to $15.26 billion by 2030, while IDTechEx also
suggested growth potential to around $30 billion by 2035. Meanwhile, UBS
presented a range of $30–50 billion by 2035, and further outlined a broader
ecosystem—including components, data, and services—expanding to $1.4–1.7
trillion by 2050.
According
to SNE Research, alongside declining cell prices by battery chemistry (LFP,
NCM, semi-solid, all-solid-state), the average cell ASP is expected to fall to
$94/kWh by 2035 and around $70/kWh by 2040. As a result, the humanoid robot
battery cell market is projected to exceed $10.5 billion by 2040.
From a
shipment/deployment perspective, Omdia forecasts over 10,000 units by 2027 and
approximately 38,000 units by 2030. Bank of America presents an aggressive
long-term scenario with annual shipments reaching around 1 million units
between 2030 and 2035. Morgan Stanley, instead of focusing on market revenue,
approaches the topic from the perspective of labor and wages, estimating 8
million working humanoids in the U.S. by 2040 and an impact of $357 billion on
wages.
Finally, a
critical factor in robot deployment is the battery, which limits operating
time. Currently, operating time is approximately 2–4 hours, but it can be
significantly reduced depending on load and operating conditions, creating
constraints on robot utilization.
Unlike EV
batteries, humanoid robot batteries must simultaneously satisfy high power
(peak output), frequent charge/discharge cycles, lightweight and compact
design, and safety for close human interaction. Accordingly, global battery
companies are recognizing robots as a new demand source and are moving toward
strengthening high-discharge performance, safety design, swappable/modular
packaging, and BMS algorithms.
LG Energy
Solution and Samsung SDI can be seen extending their capabilities in
high-power, high-reliability cells/modules for robots, along with safety
evaluation know-how and BMS technologies, similar to their approach in UAM and
drones. Chinese major players (CATL, EVE, etc.) are also clearly moving toward
improving both energy density and safety through high-power product lineups and
semi-solid/all-solid-state roadmaps for robots and drones. From a robot-focused
perspective, companies like Grepow, which are strong in high-discharge packs
for drones and robots, are expanding the market by offering integrated
solutions including pack design, thermal management, connectors, and protection
circuits.
From a
battery form factor perspective, practical options can be summarized as (1)
cylindrical-based modules (e.g., 2170/4680), (2) pouch-based customized packs,
and (3) swappable cartridge (hot swap) packs. Cylindrical cells benefit from a
large supply chain and strong cost/maturity advantages, making them suitable
for mass production. Pouch cells offer greater design flexibility due to
efficient space utilization in irregular structures such as the robot torso,
back, and pelvis. Hot swap reduces downtime for 24-hour operations
(factories/logistics), but increases system complexity due to connector
durability, surge protection, and dual power system design requirements.
Application
scenarios vary: in industrial settings, hot swap combined with fleet management
(swap stations) is dominant; in service/retail, docking-based charging
(semi-autonomous to autonomous) is more practical; and for home use, autonomous
docking with fast top-up charging becomes important due to usability.
Ultimately, humanoid battery competitiveness is likely to evolve into
system-level competition encompassing not only cell chemistry but also pack
structure, thermal management, charging/swapping UX, and BMS software.
This
report is not limited to a single topic such as market outlook or application
scenarios for humanoid robots. Instead, it comprehensively covers key
technologies, core components such as actuators and batteries, operational
software, and market outlooks, enabling a holistic understanding from
technology to market in a single report.
Therefore, the strengths of this report are as follows:
①
This report provides a deep-dive analysis of core technologies and key
components, enabling insights into technical issues and future development
outlooks of humanoid robots.
② It
offers a more detailed description of the development history, current status,
and information of global humanoid robot manufacturers, which have previously
been relatively simplified, thereby greatly helping to understand the current
landscape.
③
The market outlook is segmented into three areas—industrial/logistics,
service/retail, and household—and utilizes highly reliable data based on UN
organizations such as UNIDO and ILO, as well as major public sources, thereby
enhancing the credibility of the analysis by closely reflecting real-world
conditions.
④
For batteries, the outlook is categorized by chemistry types such as LFP, NCM,
semi-solid, and all-solid-state, and also by form factors including
cylindrical, pouch, prismatic, and structural/custom packs, allowing for more
realistic and practical forecasting.
Contents
| 1. Overview of the Humanoid Robot Industry and Market and Commercialization Outlook | 11 |
| 1-1. Humanoid Robots | 12 |
| 1-1-1. Morphological Classification | 13 |
| 1-1-2. Detailed Specifications of Major Companies’ Models | 14 |
| 1-2. Overview of the Humanoid Robot Industry | 18 |
| 1-2-1. Explosive Growth and the Commercialization Inflection Point | 19 |
| 1-2-2. Development Stages: Transition from Level 3 (Conditional Autonomy) to Level 4 (High-Level Autonomy) | 20 |
| 1-3. Humanoid Robot Market Outlook | 21 |
| 1-3-1. Global Market Outlook | 21 |
| 1-3-2. U.S. Market Outlook | 34 |
| 1-3-3. China Market Outlook | 36 |
| 1-3-4. U.S. vs. China | 42 |
| 1-3-5. Humanoid Robot Manufacturing Cost Structure | 45 |
| 1-3-6. Analysis of Humanoid Robot Costs and Investment Payback Period | 46 |
| 1-3-7. Comparison of Forecasts by Research Firms | 47 |
| 1-3-8. Market Size of Core Components for Humanoid Robots | 48 |
| 1-3-9. Global Robot Dog Market: Expected to Exceed RMB 8 Billion (USD 1.12 Billion) by 2030 | 49 |
| 1-3-10. CES 2026 | 50 |
| 1-4. Status of Global Humanoid Robot Manufacturers | 53 |
| 1-4-1. U.S. Companies and Chinese Companies | 53 |
| 1-4-2. Detailed Overview of Overseas Companies | 54 |
| 1-4-3. Detailed Overview of Chinese Companies | 55 |
| 1-4-4. Company Types and Capabilities of Major Players | 56 |
| 1-4-5. Status of Global Big Tech Companies | 57 |
| 1-4-6. Development History of Major Companies | 58 |
| 1-4-7. Continued Entry of Large Corporations and Strengthening Trends | 62 |
| 1-4-8. Active Participation of a Wide Range of Global Companies | 63 |
| 2. National Policies, Industrialization Strategies, and Commercialization of Humanoid Robots | 64 |
| 2-1. Global Trends in the Humanoid Robot Industry | 65 |
| 2-1-1. Development History and Key Characteristics by Country | 65 |
| 2-1-2. United States, Europe, and Japan | 66 |
| 2-1-3. Japan | 67 |
| 2-1-4. China | 68 |
| 2-2. Development Strategies and Commercialization Roadmap | 75 |
| 2-2-1. Accelerating Technological Advancement | 75 |
| 2-2-2. (Models with In-House Development of Both H/W and S/W) vs. (In-House Robot Development with Collaborative Development of Large S/W Models) | 77 |
| 2-2-3. Commercialization Roadmap for Humanoid Robots | 78 |
| 2-2-4. Production Plans of Major Companies by Country | 79 |
| 2-2-5. Application Scenarios | 80 |
| 2-2-6. Short-Term Applications | 82 |
| 2-2-7. Long-Term Applications | 83 |
| 2-2-8. From Specialized Use to General-Purpose Use | 85 |
| 2-2-9. Commercialization | 86 |
| 3. Core Intelligence Technologies Used in Humanoid Robots | 87 |
| 3-1. Humanoid Robot Intelligence Technologies and Terminology | 88 |
| 3-2. Embodied AI / LLM and VLA Technologies | 89 |
| 3-2-1. Embodied AI Technologies Enhance the Autonomous Operation Capabilities of Humanoid Robots | 90 |
| 3-2-2. Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) | 91 |
| 3-2-3. Development of Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) | 93 |
| 3-2-4. Figure 03 General-Purpose Vision–Language–Action (VLA) Model | 104 |
| 3-3. Learning Infrastructure (Data, Training, Motion Capture) | 109 |
| 3-3-1. Training | 109 |
| 3-3-2. Data | 110 |
| 3-3-3. Internet (Video) Data | 111 |
| 3-3-4. Simulation Data | 112 |
| 3-3-5. Real-World Data | 113 |
| 3-3-6. High-Precision Motion Capture Systems | 114 |
| 3-3-7. Inertial Motion Capture | 115 |
| 4. NVIDIA-Centric Robot Software and Platforms | 116 |
| 4-1. Software for Humanoid Robots | 117 |
| 4-1-1. Software: Shortage of Intelligent Data Hindering Industry Development | 117 |
| 4-1-2. Software: Lack of High-Quality Datasets and Specialized Application Scenarios | 118 |
| 4-1-3. Software: Physical AI and the Concepts of ACP and MCP | 119 |
| 4-1-4. Software: Comparison of Physical AI and ACP/MCP and the Importance of a Decoupled Architecture | 120 |
| 4-1-5. Software: Physical AI and ACP/MCP Strategies—Comparison of Tesla, Boston Dynamics, and Figure | 121 |
| 4-2. NVIDIA Physical AI Platform Strategy and Partner Ecosystem | 122 |
| 4-2-1. Core of Physical AI: Perception, Understanding, and Interaction | 122 |
| 4-2-2. Building a Physical AI Ecosystem Based on Omniverse | 123 |
| 4-2-3. Establishing an Omniverse-Based Development Ecosystem | 124 |
| 4-2-4. Development Platforms and Tools – Bottom-Up Integration | 125 |
| 4-2-5. Development of the Newton Robot Physics Engine | 127 |
| 4-2-6. NVIDIA AI and Robotics Engineering Partners | 128 |
| 4-2-7. NVIDIA Humanoid Robot Partners | 129 |
| 4-2-8. Three Computing Platform Solution Frameworks | 130 |
| 4-2-9. DGX Platform: Optimal Combination of Infrastructure and Expertise | 131 |
| 4-2-10. AGX Platform: Revolution in Embedded AI Product Development | 132 |
| 4-2-11. Omniverse Development Platform – AI-Based Tool Ecosystem | 133 |
| 4-2-12. Cosmos Platform – World Foundation Model | 135 |
| 4-2-13. Release of Large-Scale Open-Source Datasets and the GROOT N1 General-Purpose Humanoid Robot Model | 136 |
| 5. Tesla Optimus Deep Dive | 137 |
| 5-1. Tesla Technology Evolution, Mass Production Strategy, and Market Potential | 138 |
| 5-1-1. Tesla AI Day Timeline | 138 |
| 5-1-2. Performance Improvements of Tesla Humanoid Robots | 139 |
| 5-1-3. Tesla AI Day 2022 | 140 |
| 5-1-4. Technological Advancements of Tesla Optimus | 155 |
| 5-1-5. Rapid Functional Improvements of Tesla Optimus | 156 |
| 5-1-6. Core Hardware Solution Components of Tesla Optimus | 157 |
| 5-1-7. Market Size of Tesla Optimus | 158 |
| 5-1-8. Market Outlook and Production Strategy for Tesla Humanoid Robots (Optimus) | 159 |
| 5-2. Tesla Patent Analysis (PCT/US2023/033983) | 160 |
| 5-2-1. Tesla’s Vertical Energy Storage Enclosure Technology Serving as the Robot Torso | 160 |
| 5-2-2. Robust Physical Coupling With Robot Limbs Through Multi-Angle Attachment Points | 161 |
| 5-2-3. Efficient Simultaneous Cooling Mechanism for Batteries and Computers Using Thermal Ducts | 162 |
| 6. Boston Dynamics ATLAS Deep Dive | 163 |
| 6-1. ATLAS Technology Comparison, Generation Evolution, and Battery Strategy | 163 |
| 6-1-1. Overview of the ATLAS 2026 Version | 164 |
| 6-1-2. Key Specifications of ATLAS 2026 | 165 |
| 6-1-3. Key Functions of ATLAS 2026 | 166 |
| 6-1-4. Comparison of 1st-Gen Griper (GR1) vs. 2nd-Gen Griper (GR2) | 167 |
| 6-1-5. 2nd-Gen Griper – Opposable Thumb | 168 |
| 6-1-6. Three Fingers Are Sufficient / Left–Right Hand Differentiation | 169 |
| 6-1-7. Beyond-Human Range of Motion, Two-Handed Operation, and Tactile Sensing | 170 |
| 6-1-8. Key Changes Between ATLAS 2024 and 2026 | 171 |
| 6-1-9. Technology Comparison: ATLAS 2024 vs. Optimus vs. Figure 03 | 172 |
| 6-1-10. Battery Strategy | 173 |
| 7. Industrial Applications of Humanoid Robots | 175 |
| 7-1. Expansion of Adoption (Manufacturing and Logistics) and Addressing Labor Supply–Demand Imbalances | 176 |
| 7-1-1. Amazon: Accelerating Deployment of Logistics Robots | 176 |
| 7-1-2. Automakers: Expanding Adoption in Intelligent Factories | 177 |
| 7-1-3. Manufacturers: A Key Factor in Easing Labor Supply–Demand Imbalances | 178 |
| 7-1-4. Across Industries: Expected to Mitigate Labor Shortages | 179 |
| 7-1-5. Aerospace Sector | 180 |
| 7-1-6. CATL | 181 |
| 7-1-7. BMW | 182 |
| 7-1-8. Figure AI | 183 |
| 7-1-9. China Media Group | 184 |
| 7-1-10. Dongfeng Liuzhou Motors | 185 |
| 8. Core Components and System Elements of Humanoid Robots | 186 |
| 8-1. Core Elements and Technical Challenges | 187 |
| 8-1-1. Core Components | 187 |
| 8-1-2. Comparison of Core Component Configurations | 188 |
| 8-1-3. AI as the Heart of Machines | 190 |
| 8-2. Actuators, Motors, Gearboxes, and Screws | 191 |
| 8-2-1. Actuator Configuration | 191 |
| 8-2-2. Definitions and Functions of Core Components for Humanoid Robots | 192 |
| 8-2-3. Company-by-Company Strategy Comparison and Cost, Reliability, and Mass-Production Readiness Comparison | 193 |
| 8-2-4. Cost Outlook for Core Components | 194 |
| 8-2-5. Planetary Roller Screw | 195 |
| 8-2-6. Frameless Torque Motor | 197 |
| 8-2-7. Gearbox | 199 |
| 8-2-8. Screw | 207 |
| 8-3. Dexterous Hand (Precision Hand) | 216 |
| 8-3-1. Overview of Dexterous Hands | 216 |
| 8-3-2. Types and Comparison of Dexterous Hand Structures | 217 |
| 8-3-3. Comparison of Hollow Cup Motors, Coreless Motors, and Brushless Cogging Motors | 218 |
| 8-3-4. Coreless Motors and Market Size | 219 |
| 8-3-5. Various Power Transmission Methods | 220 |
| 8-3-6. Market Outlook for Coreless (DC) Motors | 221 |
| 8-3-7. Comparison of Atlas GR2 vs. Human Hands vs. Tesla Optimus Hands | 223 |
| 8-3-8. Optimal DoF Scenarios for Next-Generation Dexterous Hands | 224 |
| 8-4. Sensors (Force, Torque, Encoders, Vision, Tactile) | 225 |
| 8-4-1. Overview of Sensors (Internal and External) | 225 |
| 8-4-2. Torque Sensors (Six-Axis Sensors) | 226 |
| 8-4-3. Force Sensors (Six-Axis Force Sensors) | 227 |
| 8-4-4. Force and Torque Sensors | 230 |
| 8-4-5. Encoders | 235 |
| 8-4-6. Vision Sensors | 237 |
| 8-4-7. Tactile Sensors | 242 |
| 8-4-8. Control Systems | 246 |
| 8-5. Quadruped Robots | 248 |
| 8-5-1. Low-Cost, High-Performance Quadruped Actuators and Body Structure Design | 248 |
| 8-5-2. Leg Design to Improve Locomotion Capability | 249 |
| 8-5-3. System Reliability and Safety Devices | 250 |
| 9. Batteries for Humanoid Robots | 251 |
| 9-1. Development Status, Market, Competitive Landscape, and Comparison With EVs | 252 |
| 9-1-1. Battery Development for Humanoid Robots | 252 |
| 9-1-2. Battery Market for Humanoid Robots | 265 |
| 10. Battery Applications for Humanoid Robots | 270 |
| 10-1. Application Cases | 271 |
| 10-1-1. Tesla Optimus | 271 |
| 10-1-2. 1X Technologies | 274 |
| 10-1-3. UBTECH | 276 |
| 10-1-4. Applications to Batteries for Autonomous Robots | 280 |
| 10-1-5. Applications to Humanoid Robots and Quadruped Robots | 281 |
| 10-2. Company Development Status | 282 |
| 10-2-1. Grepow (CN) | 282 |
| 10-2-2. Nandu Power (南都电源) vs. Delco (德尔股份) | 285 |
| 10-2-3. BTR (贝特瑞) vs. Haopeng (豪鹏科技) | 286 |
| 10-2-4. EVE Energy (亿纬锂能) vs. Lyric Robot (利元亨) | 287 |
| 10-2-5. MANST (曼恩斯特) vs. Guansheng Tech (冠盛股份) | 288 |
| 10-2-6. Gotion High-Tech (国轩高科) | 289 |
| 10-2-7. Dataa Robotics (CN) | 290 |
| 10-2-8. IL (IL Science, Korea) | 293 |
| 11. Battery Design, Safety, Thermal Management, and Cell/Pack Estimation for Humanoid Robots | 295 |
| 11-1. Battery Design, Safety, and Thermal Management | 296 |
| 11-1-1. Figure 03 Battery | 296 |
| 11-2. Battery Cell/Pack Estimation | 301 |
| 11-2-1. Power Consumption by Body Part and Required Energy Calculation for Humanoid Robots | 301 |
| 11-2-2. Estimation of the Number of 2170 Cells and Pack Size, and Feasibility of Installation | 302 |
| 11-2-3. Estimation of the Number of 4680 Cells and Pack Size, and Feasibility of Installation | 303 |
| 11-2-4. Estimation of Installed Battery Pack Capacity for Major Humanoid Models | 304 |
| 11-2-5. Comparison of Installed Capacity vs. Actual Capacity and Fit Assessment | 305 |
| 11-2-6. Gap Analysis and Roadmap for 2–8 Hour Operation | 306 |
| 11-2-7. Structural Batteries, Specialized Batteries, and Estimation of Optimus Cells | 307 |
| 11-2-8. Battery Specifications Applied by Robot Manufacturers | 308 |
| 12. Battery Form Factors and Pack Design/Modeling for Multi-Legged Robots | 309 |
| 12-1. Next-Generation Structural Batteries (EFSB) | 310 |
| 12-1-1. Overview of EFSB | 310 |
| 12-1-2. EFSB: Serving as Tendons and Legs of Robots | 311 |
| 12-1-3. EFSB: Electrochemical Performance and Durability | 312 |
| 12-1-4. EFSB: Application to Soft Robots – Integration of Energy Storage and Actuation Functions | 313 |
| 12-1-5. EFSB: Application to Flying Robots – Maximizing High-Power Discharge and Portability | 314 |
| 12-2. High-Power Battery Pack Design and Modeling for Multi-Legged Robots | 315 |
| 12-2-1. Background of Battery Pack Design and Transient Performance Modeling for High-Power Multi-Legged Robots | 315 |
| 12-2-2. Molicel-Based P45B 16S3P Design | 316 |
| 12-2-3. Mechanical Structure and Electrical System | 317 |
| 12-2-4. Battery Modeling and EIS Analysis | 318 |
| 12-2-5. Integrated Simulation and Optimization | 319 |
| 13. Humanoid Cost Structure and Low-Cost BOM Strategies | 320 |
| 13-1. Cost Analysis | 321 |
| 13-1-1. Humanoid Robots, Actuators, Sensors, and LiDAR | 321 |
| 13-1-2. Computing, Batteries, Skeleton, and Software | 322 |
| 13-1-3. Cost Range by Component | 323 |
| 13-1-4. Conditions for a Humanoid Price Below $20K | 324 |
| 13-1-5. 2025–2030 Cost Scenarios | 325 |
| 13-1-6. 2030 BOM (Example): 50 Joints + 2.0 kWh | 326 |
| 13-1-7. Cost Reduction Strategies | 327 |
| 13-1-8. Estimated Unit Cost of Tesla Bot | 329 |
| 13-1-9. Outlook for Tesla Robot BOM (Based on China-Made Component Pricing) | 330 |
| 13-1-10. Cost Share by Humanoid Robot Component | 331 |
| 14. Issues and Technical Challenges Related to Humanoid Robots | 332 |
| 14-1. Issues Facing Humanoid Robots | 333 |
| 14-1-1. High Manufacturing Costs | 333 |
| 14-1-2. High Maintenance Costs | 334 |
| 14-1-3. Difficulty in Addressing Diverse Requirements | 335 |
| 14-1-4. Industrial Safety Standards Not Yet Fully Established | 336 |
| 14-1-5. Ethical Issues | 338 |
| 14-2. Technical Challenges of Humanoid Robots | 339 |
| 14-2-1. Fatigue Failure of Compliant Gears → Increased Failure Rates | 340 |
| 14-2-2. Transmission Ratio Limitations of Harmonic Gear Reducers → Degraded Accuracy and Response Speed | 340 |
| 14-2-3. Temperature Rise Control of Frameless Torque Motors → Reduced Mechanical Energy Efficiency | 341 |
| 14-2-4. Limitations in Data Collection Methods → Impact on Learning and Adaptability | 342 |
| 14-2-5. Hardware and Software Limitations → Impact on Robot Adaptability and Performance | 343 |
| 14-2-6. Software Limitations | 344 |
| 14-2-7. Still-Low Level of Artificial Intelligence | 347 |
| 15. Industry Trends for Humanoid Robot-Related Companies | 348 |
| 15-1. Overview of Major Humanoid Robot Companies | 349 |
| 15-2. Tesla (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 350 |
| 15-3. Boston Dynamics (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 354 |
| 15-4. Agility Robotics (US): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 358 |
| 15-5. 1X Technologies (SWE): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 361 |
| 15-6. UBTECH Robotics (CN): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 366 |
| 15-7. Unitree Robotics (CN): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 370 |
| 15-8. Rainbow Robotics (KR): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 385 |
| 15-9. Honda (JP): Humanoid Robot Manufacturing | 388 |
| 15-10. Tesla (US): Actuators | 391 |
| 15-11. 1X Technologies (SWE): Actuators | 395 |
| 15-12. UBTECH Robotics (CN): Actuators | 397 |
| 15-13. Rollvis (SWE): Planetary Roller Screws | 399 |
| 15-14. Ewellix (SWE): Planetary Roller Screws | 402 |
| 15-15. QCMT&T (CN): Planetary Roller Screws | 404 |
| 15-16. Bosch (DE): Sensors | 406 |
| 15-17. Honeywell (US): Sensors | 409 |
| 15-18. Texas Instruments (US): Sensors | 412 |
| 15-19. Hanwei Electronics (CN): Sensors | 415 |
| 15-20. Kollmorgen (US): Frameless Torque Motors | 417 |
| 15-21. Parker (US): Frameless Torque Motors | 421 |
| 15-22. Aerotech (US): Frameless Torque Motors | 424 |
| 15-23. Kinco (CN): Frameless Torque Motors | 427 |
| 15-24. Nabtesco (JP): Gearboxes | 431 |
| 15-25. Siemens (DE): Gearboxes | 435 |
| 15-26. Kollmorgen (US): Gearboxes | 438 |
| 15-27. Harmonic (CN): Gearboxes | 440 |
| 16. Humanoid Robot Company and Product Landscape | 443 |
| 16-1. Korea: LG Electronics, Holiday Robotics, ROBROS, AROBOT, ROBOTIS, WIRobotics, Rainbow Robotics, Robotics LAB, NAVER Labs | 444 |
| 16-2. Japan: KAWASAKI, TOYOTA Research Institute, Honda Robotics, HITACHI, KONDO, SoftBank Robotics, SONY, TokyoRobotics | 448 |
| 16-3. China: AgiBot, UNITREE, ENGINEAI, AT ROBOTICS, UBTECH, Noetix Robotics, ESTUN, Fourier, Kepler, Leju Robot, Haribit, Fourier, GALBOT, TSROBOT, Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, CHERY, PUDU, UBTECH, REEMAN, Robot Era, UniX AI, XIAOMI, XPENG | 450 |
| 16-4. United States: Boston Dynamics, RoboForce, Cartwheel, Diligent Robotics, Figure, Hanson Robotics, Agility Robotics, Apptronik, Westwood Robotics, Beyond Imagination, Borg Robotics, Tesla, Figure | 458 |
| 16-5. Germany: Agile Robotics, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), German Aerospace Center (DLR), NEURA Robotics | 463 |
| 16-6. United Kingdom: HUMANOID, ENGINEERED ARTS | 464 |
| 16-7. Canada: Mirsee Robotics, SANCTUARY AI, Realbotix | 466 |
| 16-8. France: Enchanted Tools, Wandercraft, InMoov | 467 |
| 16-9. Italy: Istituto Italiano di Technologia (iit), ErgoCub | 468 |
| 16-10. Spain: PAL Robotics, Keybotic, Macco Robotics | 469 |
| 16-11. Norway: 1X Technologies | 470 |
| 16-12. Switzerland: Hexagon Robotics, Duatic AG, Anybotics AG, RIVR | 471 |